Institutional AI research • Governance • Assurance
Independent research, governance frameworks, industry outlooks and AI Governance Ratings™ designed to support enterprise, government and regulated industries.
Publications
Four titles
Sector frameworks
Four sectors
Review cadence
Continuous
Latest research
Outlooks, benchmarks and sector frameworks published under the AIGX methodology. Each entry states where it stands, so a reader can tell a published position from work still in review.
AIGX-R-2026-01Market outlook · v1.3
How ratings, gate logic and comparable scoring are being introduced into AI procurement, and what buyers in regulated sectors are expected to ask for over the coming year.
AIGX-R-2026-02Benchmark · v1.0
Control coverage, evidence completeness and open gate states across completed assessments, reported as cohort ranges under consent and confidentiality rules.
AIGX-G-2026-01Framework · draft
Public accountability, transparency, rights and safety, records and oversight — set out as controls with named obligations, required artifacts and accountable owners.
AIGX-H-2026-01Framework · v1.2
Clinical safety, model validation, human oversight, monitoring, third-party controls and data privacy for one AI system in clinical or operational use, or in active pre-deployment.
Research programs
Each sector framework defines its own controls, risk classes and evidence requirements, and runs on the same assessment infrastructure.
Clinical AI · SaMD
Clinical safety, evidence traceability, human oversight, privacy and lifecycle monitoring.
Banks · insurers
Model risk, explainability, fairness, third-party controls and regulatory reporting.
Autonomous agents
Delegated authority, tool access, action boundaries, escalation and observability.
Public sector
Public accountability, transparency, rights and safety, records and oversight.
Methodology
Criteria are published before findings are. Issuance is separated from remediation support. Every position carries a documented path to challenge it.
01
Scoring criteria, risk classes and evidence requirements are published before an assessment is scored against them.
02
Platform workflow and remediation support are held apart from rating issuance and reviewer approval.
03
A rated organization can contest a finding through a recorded process, with the outcome traceable to the evidence.
Next step
Disclaimer
AIGX™ assessments and ratings are independent governance evaluations and do not constitute certifications, regulatory approvals, legal opinions, or attestations of compliance. References to third-party standards, regulations, and frameworks are provided for alignment purposes only and do not imply affiliation, endorsement, sponsorship, or certification by their respective owners.